Rule Brettannia

I had my first all-Brettanomyces beer earlier this month: Evil Twin’s Femme Fatale, which was on keg at the Cask in Clerkenwell, and is apparently meant to be a “Brett IPA”. It was … “interesting”, but perhaps only if you believe it’s interesting to drink something that tastes like essence of sweaty old leather sandals.

A Brettanomyces yeast cell

All-Brett beers have been popular for several years now in the US, of course. But the point about Brett, I think, is that, rather like hops, it’s meant to be used as a “spice” in beer, not the only audible ingredient. An all-Brett beer is an orchestra where the timpani is so amplified, you can’t hear anything else. If you want to use Brett – and it’s been an influence in brewing for many centuries, albeit a mostly unrecognised one – then it needs to be used judicially, particularly as its effects, the aromas and flavours it gives to beer, vary considerably depending on just how great a role Brettanomyces yeasts have been given. A subtle suggestion of something funky can be fine in a strong, complex ale. Being battered about the nostrils with all the aromas of a rugby team changing-room after a tough match on a hot day – not so much.

(Incidentally, the next person who writes that Brett gives a “horseblanket” aroma to beers will be poked with red-hot branding irons: I doubt more than one in five hundred beer drinkers knows what a horse blanket smells like, and I bet very, very few beer writers who steal that description from Michael Jackson have ever sniffed a horse blanket either.)

My wrestle with Femme Fatale (which I left sitting on the bar after less than a third of a pint) was a good limbering-up, however, for a beer Ed Wray of the Old Dairy brewery in Kent sent me more than a year ago, his “homage” to Colne Spring Ale. CSA is another legendary beer, vanished many years ago yet still talked about. It was made by Benskin’s of Watford, the biggest brewery Hertfordshire produced; named after the River Colne, which flows through Watford on its way to the Thames; and famous for being one of the strongest beers in Britain until it finally vanished in 1970.

There are a host of stories about Colne Spring Ale and its strength: it was a highly regarded brew 120 years ago, when Alfred Barnard, the great Victorian beer and whisky journalist, visited Benskin’s brewery. Of CSA he wrote:

“Never was there a more delicious beverage that this … full-flavoured, soft, creamy, yet vigorous.”

Some 60 years later, CSA entered the life of Bob Hawke, the Australian prime minister best known for drinking two and a half pints of beer in 12 seconds while he was at Oxford University in the early 1950s (this is often said to have been done using a yard of ale, but in fact Hawke seems to have been drinking from a “sconce pot” – the tankard reserved for offenders against college etiquette. The account is from Hawke’s 1979 biography, by John Hurst: “Frearson” is Keith Frearson, later an economics professor at Monash University in Melbourne.

At Cambridge Frearson was one of the instigators of a practical joke against Australians who boasted they couldn’t get drunk on English ale. Hawke was one of the victims. Frearson, Salter and John Smith, a dentist, had discovered a particularly potent brew, Benskins’ Colne Spring Ale, priced at half a crown a bottle. It was so strong that publicans seldom sold large quantities to their English customers, who generally had a milder taste. But Australians, confident that they could hold their liquor, were fair game.

Frearson and Smith decided to try it out on Australians from Oxford and Cambridge who were playing an Aussie Rules football match for a combined universities eighteen against a scratch team of Australian sailors from a visiting ship. Bob Hawke and his fiancée, Hazel, were among the Australians who travelled from Oxford to London for the game. It was played in the snow on a very cold day and the Navy, who were in better condition, won. Feeling slightly disconsolate, sore, and in need of warmth and good cheer, members of the universities side went to a tavern recommended by Frearson.

Hawke had a reputation as a big drinker. He had set a new sconce record at Oxford by drinking two and a half pints of beer in twelve seconds, for which he got his name in the Guinness Book of Records. Frearson told him about the marvellous Colne Spring Ale and how he and his friends had got plastered on it. He added, “Three of those and you’ll be full.” Hazel did not drink but Hawke and his other companions could not resist the challenge, and in Benskins they met their match. Frearson vaguely remembers the whole scene disintegrating: he recalls a toothless old woman playing the honky-tonk in the pub – not much else. Near closing time Hawke, Frearson, Smith and two girls from Perth weaved out of the pub and piled into Hawke’s rattletrap van. With the still sober Hazel at the wheel they drove off into the whirling night, singing uproariously a snatch from a half-remembered song.

“Half a crown” is two shillings and six pence, which means those were half-pint bottles of CSA Hawke and his university pals were drinking, since in 1953, about the same time, “nip” (six and two thirds fluid ounce) bottles of CSA were one shilling and eightpence. CSA, according to Ron Pattinson’s notes, had an alcohol by volume in 1953 of 10.95 per cent. Three half-pint bottles would be the equivalent of not quite four and a half pints of “ordinary” bitter, or around a bottle of wine. Drink that quickly enough, without food (and what pub served food in early 1950s Britain?), and I’m sure you would feel “full”. I doubt, as perhaps you do, that Hawke and his pals stuck to just three half-pints, either, though a writer in 1949 said that Benskin’s licensees were not supposed to serve more than four bottles of Colne Spring Ale to any one customer – “and four bottles is quite enough”.

That abv, from an original gravity of 1090.7, was achieved through a remarkable attenuation: just under 91 per cent. A couple of other brewers were achieving similar attenuations at the time with big, bad brews, but most high-gravity beers in Britain at the time were seeing attenuations in the 60 to 79 per cent range. How were Benskin’s achieving this? By deliberately adding a Brettanomyces culture to the beer after its initial brewing, and then storing it in casks for months in cellars that sat below the maltings at the brewery in Watford. There the slow-acting Brett yeast found an environment where it could flourish, already quite high in alcohol, which cut down on competition from less alcohol-tolerant organisms, and with the oxygen that, unlike “normal” brewer’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it preferred to maximise its own alcohol production, it could work away, increasing the beer’s strength while adding a unique cocktail of esters and acids.

That wasn’t a trick the brewers knew when Alfred Barnard sampled Colne Spring Ale in 1890: they certainly kept the beer for months to mature, but they never actually deliberately added Brettanomyces. It was, instead, simply in the air, or, more accurately, in the wooden brewing vessels, tubs, tuns, backs and casks they used, just as it was in every other brewery in Britain. However, while brewers after the researches of Louis Pasteur in France and Emil Christian Hansen in Denmark knew about Saccharomyces cerevisiae, they remained unaware of the existence of Brettanomyces. They only knew that while the “pure yeast culture” ideas that Hansen pioneered at the Carlsberg brewery in Copenhagen might work with continental beers, British ales and stouts failed to achieve a satisfactory secondary fermentation, and failed to arrive at the full range of flavours desired by connoisseurs, if they pitched with a “pure” yeast selected from just one strain.

It took another Dane, Niels Hjelte Claussen, a younger colleague of Hansen’s at Carlsberg in Copenhagen, to discover what was going on. In or shortly before 1903, Claussen isolated a previously unknown type of yeast from a sample of English “stock” (that is, well-aged) beer that was, he discovered after experimenting with it, the source of those “mature” flavours associated with aged English ales, beers, porters and stouts. In honour of its origins, Claussen named this newly found yeast “Brettanomyces”, from the Greek for “British”, “Βρεττανοί”, and “fungus”, “μύκης”

Colne Spring Ales by Ed Wray, left, and Ind Coope, right

Soon after, Claussen spoke to a meeting of English brewers at Brewers’ Hall in the City of London in April 1904 about his experiments with Brettanomyces:

“I have fermented with English single cell top yeast a Danish stout wort prepared by decoction mashing, and, after addition of Brettanomyces and 2 or 3 weeks storage, I bottled the beer, which was then left to stand for a fortnight at a temperature of 77 F. According to the verdict of several connoisseurs, the product thus obtained was in no way inferior to the best sorts of London stout, whilst parallel bottles which did not contain Brettanomyces entirely lacked the English character.”

Brettanomyces, Claussen (who only died in 1955) told his audience at Brewers’ Hall

“produces a slow fermentation in wort, or in beer fermented with ordinary brewer’s yeast. The carbonic acid developed by its action is retained very firmly, and when set free by agitation, forms a copious and lasting foam. In the course of the fermentation, rather a considerable amount of acid is formed, accompanied by ethereal substances, the taste and flavour of which cannot fail to attract the attention of any connoisseur by their striking resemblance to the flavour of stored English beers.”

In the average English brewery, he said, Brettanomyces

“exists as a general infection … I suppose it invariably forms a minor constituent of English pitching yeast and it may probably be found in all such places in the pipes utensils and vessels of the breweries where such infections may creep in and get fixed.”

It was the lack of Brett in pure-yeast cultures that meant pure-yeast brewing did not produce the required taste in English beers. The action of Brettanomyces, Claussen said, was

“absolutely necessary to bring English stock beers into proper cask and bottle condition, and to impart to them that peculiar and remarkably fine favour which, in a great measure, determines their value.”

It was, he said,

“very easy to furnish a direct and striking evidence of its being so. If we add to pasteurised beer a slight portion of a Brettanomyces culture in wort, say a few drops to a bottle of the beer, and if we then leave the beer to stand in well corked bottles at a temperature of 75-85F during 10-14 days, a slight deposit will be observable, and at the same time the beer will assume an unmistakable English character, both in regard to its content of carbonic acid gas and to its taste and flavour.”

Trying the same trick on Continental bottom-fermented beers, Claussen said, and even poorly attenuated Continental top-fermented beers, led to a beer with “a somewhat impure taste”. It was probably unnecessary, he said, to make sure English “running” beers, “which do not undergo any secondary fermentation”, came into contact with Brett. But

“with the various sorts of stock beers, the case is quite different. In the case of these beers, the action of Brettanomyces is a necessary condition for the production of a beverage possessing the properties wished for, and it is therefore necessary, after the yeast has done its work and has been separated off, to add a pure culture of Brettanomyces.”

This could be as little as a pint of 1055 OG wort in which a pure culture of Brett had been grown for a week to every five barrels of beer, Claussen said, added when the primary fermentation was over. The addition of Brettanomyces could make a considerable difference to the strength of the final beer: “Some varieties produced a considerable quantity of alcohol, eg 4 or 5 per cent, but it took a long time. It was a very slow fermentation,” he told the meeting. However, any British beer stored for five or six weeks or longer would benefit from the addition of a little pure Brett culture, Claussen said.

Alas, Claussen’s revelations came just as the “peculiar and remarkably fine flavour” of stock ales and stouts was going out of fashion. As one of the audience at the meeting in Brewers’ Hall, the brewing chemist Dr Edmund Moritz, told the speaker, the types of beers in which Brettanomyces evidently played such an important part were becoming “every day less important, because the tendency of modern brewing was against the production of stock beer, and the substitution of what possibly Mr Claussen might call a running beer, viz a beer kept anywhere between four and 12 days before it was sent out of the brewer’s cellar.”

Unsurprisingly, Brettanomyces later turned up in maturing Guinness stout, and researchers also found different sorts of Brettanomyces yeasts in Belgian lambic beers. However, Brett character became, with the exception of beer such as Colne Spring Ale, something British brewers tried to eliminate from their breweries. After the First World War, more and more beers in Britain were low in gravity, and Brett flavours and aromas do not seem to go with low gravity beers.

Colne Spring Ale continued, however, impregnated with Brett (presumably after Benskin’s brewers took heed of Claussen’s suggestion to add the yeast deliberately rather than rely on any infections in the brewery’s vats and casks), still naturally conditioned in the bottle, and depending on which source you believe, matured in the brewery’s cellars for “at least a year” or as long as seven years. Wartime restrictions finally brought its brewing to a halt in 1944, but it was revived again in 1951. However, the post-Second World War version appears to have been pasteurised, rather than naturally conditioned. Even so, Andrew Campbell said of it in 1956 that it was ” dark [37 on the Lovibond scale, as dark as Benskin’s Nut Brown Ale], mellow, and pours like wine, very slightly carbonated. It is rich and luscious in flavour, in no way edulcorated [sweetened] … beer that should be treated with the very greatest respect.” It looks, judging by the attenuation, and that “not sweet” comment by Campbell, to have still been brewed with an addition of Brett.

Ed Wray’s Colne Spring Ale 2011

Colne Spring Ale survived Benskin’s takeover by Ind Coope in 1957, and only ceased production in February 1970, two years before the Watford brewery itself closed. The name was revived briefly by Allied Breweries in the mid-1980s, albeit at a vastly reduced strength. But my writing about CSA in Amber Gold & Black, my book from 2010 on the history of British beerstyles, from mild to barley wine, apparently inspired Ed Wray to recreate it, and he was nice enough to send me a bottle.

How was it? Very good: liquorice and toffee apples, the lightest hint of ginger, a touch of – don’t laugh – cooked egg yolk, the faint sweaty, gym floorboards hint of Brett. The underlying sweetness, was perhaps TOO sweet for complete historical accuracy: maybe (what do I know? I’m not a brewer, despite my pretentions) the Brett should have been given more time. But it would definitely be on my shopping list.

Ind Coope Benskins Colne Spring Ale circa 1965

I had a genuine nip-sized bottle of Watford-brewed Colne Spring Ale from the Ind Coope era to compare with Ed’s homage, but alas the past 40-odd years had been unkind, despite it being sealing with a cork-lined crown top. It had a much fuller, oilier mouthfeel, with hints of bread pudding and baked raisins, but the overwhelming taste was the “chocolate liqueur” flavour I’ve had before in aged bottled beers that have turned up their toes. There was the ghost of past character apparent, but ultimately age had done for this beer, and it was a sinkpour – a needed reminder that not all very old beers are going to be any good.

Conclusions? I wished I had experimented with adding small amounts of Femme Fatale to other beers: it would be extremely interesting to see how just a touch of Brett reacted with, eg, an Imperial Stout, an American IPA, a brown ale. The current American obsession with all-Brett beers is not going to get very far, certainly in Britain: it really is the exact beery equivalent of the how-hot-can-you-make-your-curry loonies. But Brett is an extremely useful spanner in the creative brewer’s toolbox: as a fan of historical reproductions I hope to see a few more new beers with a touch of Brett appearing on the market, using the techniques outlined by Claussen 108 years ago, and I congratulate Ed Wray for an excellent first effort.

46 thoughts on “Rule Brettannia

  1. Orval in Belgium adds a small amount of Brett to their signature beer for conditioning. If you have it fresh in Belgium, it is a pretty hoppy beer with minimal locker room sweat. As it ages in the bottle though, the Brett becomes stronger and the hops fade. I’d love to taste a fresh bottle next to a year-old bottle.

    Like

  2. Indeed I would have poured some of the Brett-laden brew into a pint of clean and rich “mild” beer (stout preferably) for a mild-and-stale. Probably 1:3 proportions would have worked well or even less of the “stale”, since it can be a potent contribution to be sure.

    The sticky horse blanket and its cuddling one to sleep. One of Jackson’s most famous images. I’ve wondered though if he got it at least in part from this statement in Charles Knight’s mid-1800’s essay on beer (from the London Miscellany) where he states that “Burton [Ale], like Sancho’s sleep, ‘wraps one all around like a blanket'”.

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=hRv2BwVonXcC&pg=PA14&lpg=PA14&dq=sancho's+blanket+beer&source=bl&ots=iyRVDB-thA&sig=SjazCnxb7Uf_CDr6Z9FG9cQxzb0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=G3EWUJCgIe

    I think the horse blanket image has a resonance because most have been around a horse at one time or another. The image means simply the smell of a horse. Most brett-advertised beers I’ve had has it although I understand some forms of brett don’t. I don’t particularly like the taste, and I’m sure that stock beers went out largely because of this, but a little can enhance character.

    Gary

    Like

    • “I think the horse blanket image has a resonance because most have been around a horse at one time or another.”

      Hmmm. I might conduct my first ever blog poll on that, Gary. That might be true in North America,. but I can’t believe it’s true in the UK.

      Like

      • A friend of mine who rides world class standard bred horses thinks its a horrible description. She thinks Brett smells nothing like horse blankets and clearly the people using the term havent spent much time around them.

        However, she finds the more generic “barnyard” term to be accurate.

        Like

  3. Actually I just realized Michael Jackson used the horse blanket reference twice at least: once in connection with the smell of Brettanomyces in aged stout, which is what you referred to, Martyn, and once in connection with a good local bitter cuddling one to sleep (“like a sticky horse-blanket”). The latter reference was actually authored by Alan Brien (see below) who Michael quoted expressly.

    It’s on page 166 of The World Guide To Beer (1977), in the chapter on Bitter. Alan Brien was a noted novelist and essayist, he died in 2008.

    One can see why Jackson picked up on it since Brien deftly evoked bucolic traditions of good local brews and horse culture, both emblems of Albion.

    Gary

    Like

  4. Most American beers that use Brett use it as a finishing yeast. Very few are actually 100%. I think the problem may have been more in the IPA factor than the Brett factor. I just don’t see how that many hops can be a compliment to that much Brett.

    Personally, I’m a huge fan of Brett, even at 100%. Russian River Brewing did one called Sanctification that was very much in the range of a Belgian Geuze (Here is my review – http://wp.me/p2ucmM-8P ). I personally loved it.

    A few weeks ago, I wrote a post about wild yeast and bacteria in brewing ( http://wp.me/p2ucmM-8O ). I focused more on American and Belgian uses, but I’m going to add a link to your post as a nice summation of Brett in Britain.

    Btw – I grew up around horses. That smell is a very powerful memory trigger for me. Could be why I like brett beers so much.

    Like

  5. Pingback: The Yeasties, The Yeasties – The WILD Beasties in my Beer! « I think about beer

          • Martyn, not the most earthshaking topic, but I wonder if pea coats (or pea jackets) have a different origin to donkey jackets. It was cool to wear navy-surplus pea jackets in North America in the 60’s and 70’s, and they looked like this:

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pea_coat

            The double-breasted look is a signature, plus the blue colour and melton (or that type) blue cloth.

            The ever-fecund wikipedia’s entry on donkey jackets states they are a loose jacket derived from workingmen’s wear in the 1800’s and were favoured by
            skinheads.

            The Canadian Navy generally would have followed British practice until recently anyway and I wonder what the Royal Navy called the meltons when worn by midshipmen. If they called them donkey jackets, perhaps there is a distant common origin to the clothing.

            When I wore my pea coat in the 60’s – sorry for the long intro – there was still the
            odd horse-drawn team delivering milk in Montreal, that’s where I first got to know nags. (Plus there were all those caleche tours to show tourists the older parts of the city, the latter are still going strong). This would have been around the time of the drinka pinta campaign in England and no it’s not about beer as oldsters here will know, but I gather the pintas have all been delivered by those cute little vans for a very long time…

            Gary

            Like

            • Gary, strictly, the donkey jacket is, of course, an entirely different garment to the pea-coat or pea-jacket: but the latter is scarcely known in the UK (I’m not aware the Royal Navy worse them, though I may be very wrong there), while the donkey jacket is very familiar.

              Like

  6. I prefer ‘licking a horse’s ass’ to a wet blanket. More accurate description. I have a few bottles of Duchesse De Bourgogne I challenge a sour lover to say is good. Putrid is an apt description.

    Like

    • each to their own of course but Duchesse De Bourgogne is a pretty easy going entry level Flemish Sour Red (and in my opinion a bloody lovely one). I often use it in tastings as it always turns a percentage of the crowd onto the style.

      Like

  7. Excellent post on Brett. I would agree that 100% brett is far too much. Too many brewers and homebrewers think it makes a beer sophisticated, but they usually over do it and ruin what could be good beers. I would love to try a Colne Spring as it sounds like the “infection” was a nuance not a big hammer. Maybe you could experiment with a couple of bottles of Col. Williams and a few drops of brett.

    Like

  8. I always think of Brett. as providing a “farm-yard” aroma/taste. But maybe that’s my childhood in a fairy farming area spent up to my knees in Fresian shite.

    Like

  9. While I agree with the general sentiment that Brett used out of balance turns into a wild-yeast measuring contest, I have to disagree with your broad sentiment that:

    “The current American obsession with all-Brett beers is not going to get very far”

    There are several brewers that are working with Brett and seeking to understand how it works and what it can do differently than Saccharomyces. You might want to check out:

    http://www.brettanomycesproject.com/

    Which is run by the brewer of Crooked Stave beers. He did his Masters work in Scotland and is applying his research to his brewery in Colorado. He does 100% Brett fermentations however by controlling pitching amounts, strains, temperature… he ends up with relatively “clean” fermentations and produces some extremely complex and balanced beer.

    Like

    • I looked at the Brettanomyces Project while writing this piece, and it is, as you say, an interesting idea – the guy behind it was at Heriot-Watt studying brewing around the same time, I think, as Ed Wray of Old Dairy. But I really can’t see beers majoring in Brett being anything other than an interest for a very iny minority, complex and interesting though they may be: it’s a bit like Gorgonzola cheese, I think it’s great but it’s very far from mainstream taste.

      Like

      • “Anything other than an interest for a very tiny minority”

        Doesn’t this describe all of what we in the US call “Craft Beer”, My understanding is that it only represents about 5% of the total beer market in the US and I would agree that brett beers are an even smaller minority within that minority. So I agree with you on that, however I think there is potential for it to grow quite a bit and become more widely known (especially among craft beer circles).

        If you are ever in Colorado you are welcome to my place and we can crack open a couple of 100% brett beers that might make you rethink the role it can play. To use your Gorgonzola metaphor, if treated right, brett can actually produce some very mild fruity flavors (ethyl-caproate one of the main ingredients in artificial pineapple). So while some people might be making stinky cheese, it also has the potential to make a nice rustic cheddar.

        Like

  10. Excellent write up Martyn, I was on holiday last week so have only just noticed it. I’m glad you liked the beer, I really must look into doing it commercially. I did suggest to Ron Pattinson he needs to have a holiday in Watford so he can dig up some brewing records…

    Chad Yakobson was at Heriot-Watt the year after me so sadly I’ve never met him, though his Brettanomyces Project is an excellent source of information on this yeast.

    I’ve been playing around with a Brett. culture again recently and I’ll make sure some comes your way so you can see the effects.

    Like

  11. Regarding the horse blanket thing – I think it should be seen the other way round. Most people describing brett as smelling of horse blanket indeed have never been around a horse but the fact they know what brett smells like means they more or less know what horse blankets smell like. I’ve been around horses, also in winter when they are covered in blankets, dragging a sleigh behind them, soaking the blanket with their sweat, and find M. Jackson’s description to be very apt. Horse blanket, horse stall, an old shed – brett is something in between.

    Like

  12. I was looking at that yeast cell again and for the life of me it looks animate, with what seem to be eyes, a flatttish nose, two feet and a tail, and an ovular mouth Its rounded shape evokes nothing so much as a puffin, or maybe a sea bird, in miniature. Is this just being suggestible or are those “features” real?

    Like

  13. I know I’m late to the party, but realize that there as many, or more, Brett strains as there are Sacc. This post is a huge generalization. Brett Brux for example, has no horse blanket/gym socks/funk whatsoever – it’s great in an IPA. It’s fairly clean and fruity. Look at some of the stuff Crooked Stave is doing and Modern Times Brett IPA. You may be eating your words right now.

    Like

      • Understood. I always thought the purpose of the comment section of a blog was for discussion. I respectfully disagree and was just seeking a little friendly debate. I’m sure 1 year after posting, your views on brett have probably changed, but sorry if I offended you.

        Like

      • Not just generalization but assbackwards since 100% Brett beers tend to exhibit much less funk than beers fermented with standard ale yeast where the brett is added later. Seems counter intuitive but is true.

        Like

        • 100% Brett beers tend to exhibit much less funk than beers fermented with standard ale yeast where the brett is added later.

          Whle I’ve only had one 100% Brett beer, from Evil Twin, that certainly wasn’t true: it was hugely funky, and ultimately undrinkable.

          Like

  14. Hi Martyn, very intriguing article, as always. I was inspired by one of your articles on “The Lost Art of Extreme Aged Ales” and as a result, I have taken on your challenge. Here is a website about my adventures… http://www.caskaleprivatereserve.com. Hope to send you a sample sometime in the near future, and thank you for providing great inspiration and insight!

    Like

    • Probably, Gary: the taste is likely to be “interesting” rather than fantastic, however. Of more interest is if there is any yeast left in the bottle: if it’s truly one of the old Watford brews, it may have some yeast residues which would be cultivated up. Get in touch with the Pope’s Yard brewry in Watford …

      Like

      • Cheers It’s pretty old so will give it a miss, found in the loft with old photos of the family. My grandfather worked for the Brewery with my father many years ago.

        Like

          • From: Zythophile To: garycobb64@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2015, 16:08 Subject: [New comment] Rule Brettannia #yiv6076710424 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv6076710424 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv6076710424 a.yiv6076710424primaryactionlink:link, #yiv6076710424 a.yiv6076710424primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv6076710424 a.yiv6076710424primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv6076710424 a.yiv6076710424primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv6076710424 WordPress.com Martyn Cornell commented: “If you have a photograph of it you could email me, I’d be able to give you an approximation of just how old it is.” | |

            Like

  15. Pingback: The Barley Men

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s